Thursday, December 26, 2019

Chinua Achebes Things Fall Apar

Book Review: Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart The novel concerned in this book review is a novel by Chinua Achebe entitled Things Fall Apart. The novel’s main character is a man named Okonkwo; at the beginning of the novel, the protagonist is portrayed as a strong man, capable of doing good things for his village and his people (Achebe). However, the protagonist is living in his father’s shadow, as his father often borrowed money from those in the village with the complete inability to pay it back. In his attempt to seem strong, Okonkwo participates in the killing of a young boy who views him as a father figure; after the death of the boy, things begin to go wrong for Okonkwo, and he is sent into exile (Achebe). Once he returns from exile, he is confronted with the presence of colonialism in his village; he and others react violently against this colonial presence, eventually burning down a Christian church. At the end of the novel, Okonkwo hangs himself rather than be tried in the colonial court (Achebe). The protagonist, Okonkwo, is the primary focus of the novel. However, the boy named Ikemefuna that Okonkwo participates in killing is also a key character in the story, as his death is the impetus for all action. In addition, Okonkwo’s lazy son, Nwoye, is designed to be a character foil against his father’s strength and stubbornness. Finally, the white characters, including the Reverend and Mr. Brown, are key players in the story, as they are the ultimate reason for Okonkwo’s death. Achebe’s writing style is very poetic. He does not hold tightly to traditional conventions, but the resulting text is one that flows like poetry while keeping the reader engaged in the story. Achebe gives the reader a feeling as well as an image, as exemplified in this quote: â€Å"And at last the locusts did descend. They settled on every tree and on every blade of grass; they settled on the roofs and covered the bare ground. Mighty tree branches broke away under them, and the whole country became the brown-earth color of the vast, hungry swarm† (Achebe). The reader gets a clear picture of the scene, but also a feeling of desolation and of impending doom because of the locusts. The novel’s diction is beautiful, and certainly one of its strengths. If it has weaknesses, the weaknesses of the novel lie in the shallow, almost caricature-like nature of the characters. Rather than developing full characters, the characters are stylized, almost symbolic in nature. Overall, this is an excellent novel that deals with some complex themes, particularly the themes of colonialism and gender. Without a keen understanding of history and the issues of colonialism, the reader may miss some of the details that make this novel so excellent. Even today, the lessons and the impacts of the novel can be felt; it is a timeless book, and one that should continue to be part of any classic collection. Works cited Achebe, Chinua. Things fall apart. New York: Anchor Books, 1994. Print. Gik and Simon I. Chinua Achebe and the invention of African culture. Research in African Literatures, 32. 3 (2001): 38. Online. Osei-Nyame, Godwin Kwadwo. Chinua Achebe writing culture: representations of gender and tradition in Things Fall Apart. Research in African Literatures, 30. 2 (1999): 148164. Online. Owusu, Kofi. The Politics of Interpretation: The Novels of Chinua Achebe. MFS Modern Fiction Studies, 37. 3 (1991): 459470. Online.

Wednesday, December 18, 2019

Symptoms And Treatment Of Ptsd - 1262 Words

have different symptoms such as depression, anxiety, substance abuse, and other issues. This trauma history will align with the diagnosis to make it clearer. A soldier has will be cycling through emotions due to lack of sleep, stress, depression, and not being able to be stable. It is important to have a non-structured interview because it will help the social worker be able to make a connection with the client. The results for this case will be important because the worst traumatic The evidence has shown by PTSD has grown into one of the fastest growing compensated conditions in the Veteran Affairs and Social Security. This disability program covers over 3 million veterans between 1999 and 2004 (Speroff, T,2012). When the diagnosis†¦show more content†¦The not standardized test findings was not accuracy either for it. When literature was involved in the clinical setting, it became accurate and within guidelines. The biggest way to meet criteria for PTSD, an individual mus t report the distress of social, occupation, and other functions. Most clinicians try to have non standardized groups before they decide on the disorder. It is to help the soldier be able to give their opinion without being tested for each symptom. The assessment can still provide a clear understanding on which ones are not within PTSD. There was utilization of testing but it was low and conducting the interview only lasted less than 30 minutes. Another issue was the veterans undergoing independent assessments that would alter their results. When the evidence of PTSD has been shown, this intervention evaluation helps to provide statistic information for the growing issue. Most veterans need this information so they can know that they are not alone. The standardize testing is shown to give a guide to the social worker but it can not gather all of the information for the case. The non-standardize testing helps with gathering information but does not have a guide to go by to diagnosis the client. It would be hard to meet the criteria depending on which test is given to the client. As a social worker, gathering as much information would help benefit the case. There is a growing number of veterans that are not counted in these statistics due

Tuesday, December 10, 2019

FedEx vs UPS †Battle for Value Essay Example For Students

FedEx vs UPS – Battle for Value Essay The Battle for Value. 2004:V. United Parcel Service. Inc. ( â€Å"UPS† ) and FedEx Corp. ( â€Å"FedEx† ) are two of the largest air bringing and cargo services. With the current transit understanding between the United States and China the market in which these companies conduct concern is traveling to turn. This is a positive understanding for both UPS and FedEx. significance that both companies are attractive in footings of puting. However. it is recommended that merely one of them should be invested in because they are really closely correlated to one another. Since this is the instance it is of import to look deeper into each company to find the degrees of attraction. Business Plan Overview Even though FedEx has the early lead on operations within China. one merely has to look at the European market place to measure how both companies will near the new concern environment post-agreement. Using the analogy of the tortoise and the hare. FedEx acts like the hare by rapidly raging up service by renting new equipment and puting up distribution hubs. This allows FedEx to acquire a head start and achieve early additions but this does non come without hazards. Within Europe. FedEx made a figure of hazards and finally sold its European hub to DHL and it is estimated that they had lost upwards of $ 1 billion from 1984-1992 on the European concern. Conversely. UPS is more like the tortoise by non being the first to market with a new service. UPS takes the clip to make their analysis and to place possible spouses in order to portion the hazards for a new venture. Within Europe. UPS did non come in the market place until 1988 but when they did enter. they did it by geting 10 Europea n messenger services. This gave UPS an already-established web with which to turn without the start-up disbursals that FedEx incurred. We can see that the same business-model attack is being used for China on both FedEx’s and UPS’s portion. FedEx was the first to come in the China market by geting air paths that service China in 1995 and presently they provide 11 hebdomadal flights to China. serving 220 metropoliss. On the other manus. UPS delayed their entry into the China market by set uping direct flights to China in 2001 but they have since partnered with Yangtze River Express to manage bundle bringing within China. Even with the late start. UPS presently provide 6 hebdomadal flights to China and service 200 metropoliss with their web. In a short sum of clip. UPS has leveraged their business-model to significantly catch up with FedEx’s web coverage and appears to be primed to excel FedEx in the near-term. EVA Analysis When measuring attractiveness one of the first things looked at is each company’s economic value added. or EVA. EVA is â€Å"the value created or destroyed each twelvemonth by subtracting a charge for capital from the firm’s net operating net income after revenue enhancements. † When comparing FedEx and UPS we can look at both their one-year and Accumulative EVA. Over the old ages 2000 to 2003 FedEx had an EVA of $ 151. $ 396. $ 373. and $ 170 severally. UPS’s EVA we see a wholly different narrative. In the old ages 2000 to 2003 we see EVAs of $ 881. $ 599. $ 392. and $ 1. 195 severally. Looking at the cumulative EVA for FedEx and UPS we see a alteration from $ 1. 653 to $ 2. 252 and $ 2. 143 to $ 4. 328. severally. What this means that over the four old ages runing from 2000 to 2004 UPS has added much travel value to their company than FedEx has. EVA 2000200120022004FedEx Annual$ ( 151 )$ ( 396 )$ ( 373 )$ 170FedEx Cumulative$ ( 151 )$ ( 547 )$ ( 920 )$ ( 750 )UPS Annual$ 881$ 599$ 392$ 1. 195UPS Cumulative$ 881$ 1. 480$ 1. 872$ 3. 067 The Arts Journal Critical Perspectives on Contemporary EssayFedEx’s solvency besides appears weaker when you take into history fixed charges like rental or lease disbursals. UPS’s deficiency of these disbursals consequences in a fixed-charge coverage ratio equal to its TIE ratio. while FedEx’s norm is dramatically lower. In add-on to being the more dependable house in footings of its ability to pay off long-run debt. UPS besides has a higher capital outgo ratio. UPS has besides increased its capital outgo ratio while FedEx’s has remained instead dead. This shows UPS’s ability to take its free hard currency flow and put it back into the company through long-run plus acquisitions. showing the potency for future growing of the company. It besides shows that UPS is gaining somewhat more from its capital outgos than its disbursement on them. The overall hard currency from operations to entire debt ratio is comparatively equal between UPS and FedEx. How ever. UPS’s ratio has been increasing over the last twosome of old ages. while FedEx’s has decreased. Taking all of these solvency measures into consideration. UPS still appears to be the more attractive investing option for Bratt’s client. Operational Efficiency RatiosIn footings of operational efficiency steps. like mean yearss outstanding. working capital turnover. fixed plus turnover. and entire plus turnover. FedEx appears to hold the advantage. Although UPS may take a small spot longer to roll up on its histories receivables. and may take longer to change over capital into gross revenues. it is still maximising stockholder value merely every bit much as FedEx. and in a less hazardous manner. Stock Price AnalysisWhen you compare the stock monetary value analysis for both FedEx and UPS. both companies have returned positive Compound Annual Growth Rates ( â€Å"CAGR† ) for both the 2000-2003 clip frame every bit good as 1992-2003. Over the longer period. UPS has returned 20. 89 % versus 18. 18 % for FedEx but for the more recent 2000-2003 period. FedEx has returned 3. 94 % versus 1. 95 % . This discrepancy in CAGR can be explained by the perceptual experience that FedEx was a growing stock and paid no dividends while UPS continually paid a dividend. This can besides be seen when you compare the Accumulative Market-Adjusted Returns ( â€Å"CMAR† ) of both UPS and FedEx. Due to the inclusion of the dividend payments. UPS surpassed FedEx in this analysis by bring forthing a 551 % CMAR versus FedEx’s 373 % . Stock Price as of Dec. 31 of1993-20032000-2003 199219992000200120022003CAGRCAGRUPS9. 2569. 0058. 7554. 5063. 0874. 5520. 89 %1. 95 %FedEx10. 1954. 8135. 5040. 0053. 9563. 9818. 18 %3. 94 % DecisionBoth UPS and FedEx are companies that have a positive tendency and are good deserving puting in. However. as both companies are closely correlated. if it recommended that you merely put in one of them. It is Bratt’s recommendation to put in UPS. UPS has the long-run scheme in topographic point to guarantee more stable returns as opposed to FedEx. FedEx may hold short-run additions but these additions are non sustainable and FedEx is at hazard for inauspicious returns in the mid-term while UPS continually shows a proved track-record of steady additions through the short and long-run.

Monday, December 2, 2019

Revenge Essays - Characters In Hamlet, Fiction, Literature, Film

Revenge Revenge causes one to act blindly through anger, rather than through reason. It is based on the principle of an eye for an eye, but this principle is not always an intelligent theory to live by. Young Fortinbras, Laertes, and Hamlet were all looking to avenge the deaths of their fathers. They all acted on emotion, and this led to the downfall of two, and the rise to power of one. Since the heads of the three major families were each murdered, the eldest sons of these families swore vengeance, and two of the three sons died while exacting their acts of vengeance, revenge is a major theme in the tragedy of "Hamlet". There were three major families in the tragedy of "Hamlet". These were the family of King Fortinbras, the family of Polonius, and the family of King Hamlet. The heads of each of these families are all slaughtered within the play. Fortinbras, King of Norway, was killed by King Hamlet; slain by sword during a man-to-man battle. This entitled King Hamlet to the land that was possessed by Fortinbras because it was written in a sealed compact. Polonius was an advisor to the King, and father to Laertes and Ophelia. He was nosy and arrogant, and he did not trust his children. Young Hamlet killed him while he was eves dropping on a conversation between Hamlet and his mother. King Hamlet was the King of Denmark, and Hamlet's father. He had killed King Fortinbras, only to be killed by his brother, Claudius. Every one of the three eldest sons had one thing in common, they all wanted revenge for a slaughtered father. In the time in which this play is set, avenging the murder of a father was part of one's honor, and had to be done. All of the three sons swore vengeance, and then acted towards getting revenge for the deaths of their fathers. Young Fortinbras was deeply enraged by the death of his father, and he wanted revenge against Denmark because of this occurrence. Fortinbras wanted to, by force, regain the lands that had been lost by his father to Denmark. Claudius sends messengers to talk to Fortinbras' uncle, the new King of Norway. He forbade Fortinbras to attack Denmark, and instead convinced him to attack the Poles to vent his anger. Laertes found out about his father's death, and immediately returned home. He confronted the King and accused him of the murder of his father. Claudius told Laertes that Haml et was responsible for his father's death. He then decides to kill Hamlet to avenge the death of his father. He and Claudius concoct a plot to kill Hamlet. Hamlet dies of wounds from the poisoned tipped sword Laertes used. Young Hamlet was deeply sorrowed by his father's death. "His deep depression, the hopeless note in his attitude towards the world and towards the value of life" (Jones 1160). He spoke to a ghost, and this ghost stated that his father's death was a murder, by the hand of his uncle, Claudius. Hamlet was astonished, and then swore vengeance for his father's death. He then proceeded to try and prove his uncle's guilt, and then finally kills him while he himself is dying of poisoned wounds inflicted by Laertes during their duel. The point envenomed too! Then venom, to thy work Here, thou incestuous, murderous, damned Dane, drink off this potion. Is thy union here? Follow my mother.(Ham.5.2.299-303). This left the King dead, and his father's death avenged. The lack of t hought used in exacting the revenge led to the deaths of both Laertes and Hamlet. Laertes planned with Claudius to kill Hamlet with the poisoned tipped sword, but neither Claudius nor Larertes had thought that the sword might be used against them. With Laertes believing the King's accusations that Hamlet had murdered his father, he was in a blind rage, and would not listen to Hamlet's explanation and apology. He fought Hamlet and wounded him once with the poisoned tipped sword; but, unfortunately, their swords are switched, and Hamlet wounded Laertes with the sword. That is the wound by which Laertes dies. Hamlet had many chances to kill his uncle, but his rage outweighed his intelligence